This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 13:39, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
in first Place,in the present space why having making i sended other interesting information relationed with Japanese foreing Commerce and Navigation aspects.
debt at reason of space,if impossibly to putting these information over realities of foreing Commerce and Navigation and others and numbers of Japanese economy why are more diffrent in these times why present japanese economy,no poses any space in present articles of japanese ancient economy.
i considered "VERY IMPORTANT" this article for complement with another relationed information of japanese economy.this information isn t redoundant.
additionally i am beliving why if time of take leaving of yours.i have to decided retireing of my contributor activity too in next times, and are my lasts articles...
Delete. One might consider merging of salvageable pieces of facts, but the source is unknown, hence low credibility. mikka(t) 01:00, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Resubmit when in English. EDM 01:02, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Uh, to be honest, I can't really make heads and tails of this. I don't want to sound mean, but a basic command of the English language is a kind of a requirement for writing an article -- honestly, right now I can't even get through the first paragraph without getting hopelessly lost; if someone can turn this into something worthwhile, I'm willing to reconsider the vote, but I just don't see that happening. -- Captain Disdain 01:23, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I have cleaned up the first para. I have done this on dozens of articles by this author. Charles Matthews
Strong keepMove or merge: Please see comments at this vfd for reasoning. Wikibofh 03:38, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Comment: I have cleaned up the rest of the article. It clearly needs to be moved or merged somewhere to clean up the title (which I would have done if it weren't in a VfD right now). I have changed my vote per this comment Wikibofh 18:03, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Keep, I'll clean it up. It should probably then be moved and merged. Charles Matthews 15:24, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
one objetive of economical commercial sections and ancient dates
and other relationed if aid to reconstructed at commercial and
some aspects of japanese common life style,how theirs thinked and your ideology and local policy.
in comparison at present japanese contemporary and your actual
lifestyle and political thinking.this present informations debt to seeing in historical perspective.
other idea if the knowed are the economical resources and your founts
for why japanese empire poses monetary resources in your war efforts
in pacific conflict.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.